Showing posts with label Health Foundation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health Foundation. Show all posts

4 March 2010

HEALTHCARE

Revision of professional roles and quality improvement. A review of the evidence (26th February 2010)
This report, from the Health Foundation, considers the impact of professional role revision on quality of care and outcomes. It focuses on two types of changes to professional roles:
  • Substitution – exchanging one type of professional for another.
  • Supplementation – extending the range of service provision within one health delivery system.
This report focuses on the revision of roles between doctors and:
  • advanced practice nurses such as nurse practitioners, specialist nurses, clinical nurses and practice nurses
  • physician assistants pharmacists
  • allied healthcare professionals such as physical therapists (referred to as physiotherapists in this review), speech and language therapists, dietitians and paramedics.
The report finds that there is no detrimental effect of revising or extending the roles of non-medical professionals, and in some cases there is a positive effect on the quality of patient care.
Report

8 July 2009

PRIMARY CARE TRUSTS

The link between healthcare spending and health outcomes (June 2009)
This report presents preliminary results from research undertaken as part of the Quest for Quality and Improved Performance (QQUIP), an initiative of The Health Foundation.
Report

25 March 2009

HEALTHCARE

Quality of healthcare in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland: an intra-UK chartbook (12th March 2009)
A new chartbook launched by the Health Foundation brings together data for the first time from across the four home nations of the UK to present a unique picture of quality. The chartbook shows that that all four countries in recent years have seen significant falls in mortality from cancer, coronary heart disease and stroke. Patient ratings of quality across the UK are also high, though all four countries are still trying to improve health inequalities between the best and worst among their populations.
Chartbook